grammar “None of us is” vs “None of us are”, Which is Correct? English Language & Usage Stack Exchange

The future of Ospital ng Maynila Medical Center is gearing towards a greater heights as it bears the foundation for its continued excellence in healthcare. One of these is the very satisfactory rating for the over-all potential as a healthcare facility under the DOH’s  Integrated Hospital Operations and Management Program (IHOMP). This award is a recognition of the hospital’s unwavering commitment to the strict implementation of the Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding and continuous adherence to the MBFHFI guidelines.

• The Department of Surgery has been recognized for its efforts in bringing world-class surgical care to the all.
• The said audit aims to “assess the agency’s compliance with the GEMP, as well as evaluate energy performance.”
• When it comes to climate, the DOH also gave the hospital a 4-star award – tagging OMMC as a champion in climate practice.

Although there are lots of people who have the right to vote, not all of them exercise that right, so not everyone in an electorate is necessarily a voter. They don’t necessarily have the right to vote, but are still represented by the elected person. This version and its common interpretation express the intended motivating sentiment. Whether right or wrong, it claims that no single person in the group can outperform the whole group working together — so we should use our combined intelligence. Having said all that, to get to your specific question, the sentence None of us is as smart as all of us is absolutely correct. Which is meant to contrast individual intelligence with groupthink,and therefore is unequivocally singular.

We are incredibly proud to honor your exceptional achievement in receiving the esteemed Asian Pillar of Exemplary Contribution to Medical Practice and Public Service award at the 3rd Asian Pillars Awards 2025. Your steadfast dedication, compassion, and relentless pursuit of excellence continue to inspire and set a high standard for the entire medical community. Your dedication to surgical excellence, education, and global health continues to inspire us all. This milestone is a testament to your leadership, passion, and commitment to advancing the field of surgery both locally and internationally. Join us for the inauguration of the newly upgraded Hemodialysis Facility, a milestone that reinforces our commitment to advanced renal care and a healthier Manila community. The question remains, at least for me, whether unintuitive is sometimes intended or understood to be stronger than non-intuitive, i.e., counter-intuitive or fully contrary.

Using “non-” to prefix a two-word phrase

An electorate is a defined geographic area that votes for the outcome of a single seat, or a set of seats. Electorate can also be used to refer to the collection of voters within that area. The electorate is the group of people who have the right to vote.

Hot Network Questions

But perhaps the definition I was given in my youth was well-meaning but incorrect. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. This milestone further reinforces OMMC’s commitment to delivering world-class healthcare grounded in quality, reliability, and patient-centered service.

“None of us is” vs “None of us are”, Which is Correct? duplicate

In this case, however, I believe “is” is more appropriate to stress the meaning that no individual is as smart as the collective all of us. If it quantifies a plural noun phrase, as in none of us, then it’s equivalent to the negation of a universal quantifier in many cases. The three examples all sound correct when using the plural “are”, rather than “is”. I want to say on social media that I am blessed to have my daughter, but I am not religious and find it awkward when people respond saying that they are sending prayers my way. I appreciate the sentiment, but I’d still like a non-religious word that holds a similar connotation. ‘unmanned’ traditionally meant ‘cowardly’ (see the phrase unmanned by fear) rather than the opposite of manned.

Alternative for “manning” a station

The Ospital ng Maynila Medical Center secured a 3-star rating from the Department of Energy for properly implementing energy efficient practices. The Ospital ng Maynila Medical Center received on Friday the Department of Health’s (DOH) accreditation for having excellent maternal and neonatal care. All architectural, engineering, construction concerns, are being taken with high standards prior to its actual implementation to ensure that the hospital followed all the policies and programs. When it comes to climate, the DOH also gave the hospital a 4-star award – tagging OMMC as a champion in climate practice. The said department received the award of the Corporate Social Responsibility from the City of Carmona for it’s strong collaboration with the Memphis Mission of Mercy.

Actually looks better because the “freak” is attached to the “non-” as much as it is to “control-“, without the space implying the presence of a phrase break. This milestone reflects the dedication of the OMMC team to excellence in patient care and continuous improvement. The said audit aims to “assess the agency’s compliance with the GEMP, as well as evaluate energy performance.” The city government hospital obtained the score of 88.4% during the Government Energy Management Program (GEMP) audit made by the said national agency on Thursday, May 15.

We share this achievement with our dedicated healthcare team and the community we serve as we continue to champion the health and well-being of every mother and child. “Un-” is defined as “a prefix meaning ‘not,’ freely used as an English formative, giving negative or opposite force in adjectives and their derivative adverbs and nouns… and less freely used in certain other nouns.” With its solid developmental and structural framework, all patients, healthcare staff, and medical residents are secured that the hospital goals remains intact. This award was echoed by the Department of Energy as the hospital obtained a 3-star rating for implementing energy efficient practices during the Government Energy Management Program (GEMP) audit.

It’s important to note the context this is used in, as it could be the electorate of a whole country or the electorate of a local constituency. Logically, then, “non-dead” might mean something like “not having died” (true of rocks and living people), and “undead” might mean “living.” But word constructions don’t always make sense. “Non-dead” isn’t a word and “undead” means non-living and supernaturally animated. The score obtained by the Ospital ng Maynila Medical Center proves that the medical facility is compliant to the efforts of the national government in promoting energy efficiency and conservation.

• It also seems that while all dictionaries (except Wiktionary) do not list “unintutive”, some dictionaries list “non-intuitive”/”nonintutitve” (Merriam Webster) while others only list “counter-intuitive” (Cambridge).
• I have noticed that not is usually used with a verb, but I think that there sometimes are exceptions although I can’t think of one now.
• The electorate is the group of people who have the right to vote.
• “Manning the help desk” for instance often refers to a rotating role where a group of people share a responsibility in turn.
• With its solid developmental and structural framework, all patients, healthcare staff, and medical residents are secured that the hospital goals remains intact.

The Navy has an interesting expression if you want to tell some to “man their station and get to work.” You tell non operating income example formula them to “Turn to, Shipmate.” I suppose you could to tell someone to “work your station.” “Staffing” can mean “to do the duty”, or “to ensure someone’s on it, not necessarily yourself”, or “to provide staff”. So it has an appropriate meaning but is potentially more general. As far as I know it’s nevertheless the “standard” alternative in this context. As you can see, it is quite defined in which each word is used.

Is there a non-gendered term for manning a station, as in manning the desk? The only ideas I can come up with are “stationed at” the desk or other clunky things. After quite some time searching I couldn’t find any rules in which those words obey to.

The Department of Surgery has been recognized for its efforts in bringing world-class surgical care to the all. Ospital ng Maynila Medical Center proudly celebrates your success—your passion, perseverance, and exemplary service motivate us all to reach greater heights. Keep shining, making a meaningful difference, and inspiring positive change in the lives of many.

I can’t think of any that could be used interchangeably at the moment. Is there a specific rule, or set of rules, that can be followed to know when to use each word? I have noticed that not is usually used with a verb, but I think that there sometimes are exceptions although I can’t think of one now. Looks like a person obsessed with not being in control rather than one who is simply not obsessed with control.

If we combine the hyphenated and non-hyphenated forms, it appears that non(-)intuitive and unintuitive are roughly equivalent in frequency today, at least looking at their Ngrams. I searched english.stackexchange and found countless answers where the word is used. I would use it to mean all those represented, whether they are voters or not, but there is room for some argument there. In most places “constituents” are a geographically defined group, but they could be, for example, the members of a profession if some body were organised to have representatives of professions. “Electorate” is usually a mass noun meaning “the collection of all voters”. Positive quantifiers are either singular in verb agreement, like each and every, or plural, like all.

In this particular case you won’t lose much meaning by reading them all as equivalents. A sitting parliamentarian’s constituents are the voters within the electorate represented by him/her. A voter is simply an individual person who votes, or potentially votes.

Hot Network Questions

It’s less than one and much less than many.So its subject agreement is entirely arbitrary. Only in recent history has “man” taken on a gendered connotation. Before, “wer” was a prefix that meant male (as used in “werewolf”), and “wif” meant female (which eventually led to the word “woman” from “wifman”). The use of “man” as gender-neutral appears today in the words “mankind,” “human,” and of course “manning.” Therefore, “manning” is a suitable gender-neutral term.

If there are too many interpretative choices in a non-hyphened usage to my liking, I will include the hyphen. As the visionary leader of the Public Health Unit at Ospital ng Maynila Medical Center, your innovative leadership and unwavering commitment have been instrumental in public health initiatives and strengthening community wellness. Your tireless efforts exemplify true service, advocacy, and a profound dedication to improving lives. One issue this question raises is that of being more precise in thinking about who is doing what.

Under the leadership of Dr. Aileen Lacsamana, and through the efforts of all the departments, the hospital received several recognitions and awards for providing high quality services. I was always taught that the ‘man’ in ‘manning a desk’ had its origins in ‘managing’, not ‘man/men/male’, which meant it was not a sexist term and was an unnecessary overcorrection to change it. My workplace recently requested that we ‘person a desk’, which grated with me because it sounds awful and doesn’t fit with the phrase’s origins (at least as I was taught them).